jroid8@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · edit-27 months agoseamless seekinglemmy.worldimagemessage-square77fedilinkarrow-up1632arrow-down123file-text
arrow-up1609arrow-down1imageseamless seekinglemmy.worldjroid8@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · edit-27 months agomessage-square77fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareZiglin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down1·7 months agoIt’s possible that it’s a logarithmic scale.
minus-squarevegantomato@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down2·edit-27 months agoRemoved by mod
minus-squarexor@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·7 months agoit’s a double log… y = log(log(x))… or maybe *graph not to scale
minus-squareilinamorato@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·7 months agoThat would make way more sense when you’re talking about relative speeds of the speed of light and pretty much anything else.
minus-squarelinearchaos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·7 months agoThey used the Windows 95 Microsoft progress bar code
Removed by mod
It’s possible that it’s a logarithmic scale.
Removed by mod
it’s a double log… y = log(log(x))…
or maybe *graph not to scale
That would make way more sense when you’re talking about relative speeds of the speed of light and pretty much anything else.
They used the Windows 95 Microsoft progress bar code