• cbarrick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    unilateral […] US and UK

    How is it unilateral if two countries are coordinated?

    (Yes, I’m being pedantic. My apologies.)

    Also, it’s not the job of the UNSC to “authorize” military action of individual nations. UNSC authorization of force (Article 42) refers to sending UN peacekeeping forces, like in the Korean war. This hasn’t happened many times.

    Article 51 allows member states to use force to defend themselves. US and UK military ships were being attacked.

    • intelshill@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      International law also allows a country to protect its own territorial waters and enforce sanctions through them. Sovereignty supercedes the right to self-defence: if a US warship sails into Chinese territorial waters and gets beat down, international law sides with China.

      • cbarrick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        What was the location of the US and UK ships? What are the treaties governing access to the Red Sea?

        Are you sure that counts as territorial waters for Yemen?