PM_ME_FAT_ENBIES@lib.lgbt to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoincest clonesmessage-squaremessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1219arrow-down121
arrow-up1198arrow-down1message-squareincest clonesPM_ME_FAT_ENBIES@lib.lgbt to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square24fedilink
minus-square30p87@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·edit-21 year agoI typically associate “clone” with “an exact copy”, with the same exact molecular layout and even thoughts. So a literal exact copy. Clones on a DNA basis, so something possible for years, would indeed be different in some details.
minus-squarePM_ME_FAT_ENBIES@lib.lgbtOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoThe definition of “clone” you believe in is science fiction nonsense. Why believe in nonsense when the scientific definition of clone is different?
I typically associate “clone” with “an exact copy”, with the same exact molecular layout and even thoughts. So a literal exact copy. Clones on a DNA basis, so something possible for years, would indeed be different in some details.
The definition of “clone” you believe in is science fiction nonsense. Why believe in nonsense when the scientific definition of clone is different?